Scientific misconduct refers to any deliberate violation of established standards of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in academic research and publication. This includes, but is not limited to, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in proposing, conducting, reviewing, or reporting research findings. Such misconduct constitutes a serious breach of academic integrity and undermines the fundamental values upon which scholarly research is based. Bulletin of Education and Language treats all allegations of misconduct with the utmost seriousness.

Scientific misconduct may occur at any stage of the research and publication process, including manuscript preparation, submission, peer review, editorial handling, and post-publication. This policy outlines the procedures followed by Bulletin of Education and Language in investigating and addressing allegations of scientific misconduct.

Identification of Suspected Misconduct

Allegations of scientific misconduct may arise from various sources, including but not limited to plagiarism-detection software, peer reviewers, editors, readers, academic institutions, or other third parties. All concerns received are handled confidentially and assessed carefully.

Reporting and Communication of Allegations

Any suspected instance of scientific misconduct should be reported promptly to the Editor-in-Chief of Bulletin of Education and Language at bel@standoutpress.org. Upon receipt of an allegation, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary assessment and, where appropriate, formally notify the corresponding author. Depending on the nature and severity of the allegation, communication may also involve co-authors, institutional authorities, or relevant funding bodies. Sufficient details will be provided to ensure the authors clearly understand the nature of the concern.

Response to Allegations

Authors will be given a defined period to respond in writing to the allegation and provide an explanation or supporting evidence. Failure to cooperate, unsatisfactory responses, or evidence of repeated misconduct may result in an expanded investigation. Where necessary, institutional officials may be invited to participate in the inquiry.

Investigation and Decision-Making

The Editor-in-Chief will evaluate all evidence objectively and in accordance with internationally recognized publication ethics guidelines. The investigation process will be fair, transparent, and unbiased, ensuring that all parties are given an opportunity to be heard.

Actions and Sanctions

If scientific misconduct is confirmed, appropriate corrective actions will be taken. These may include rejection of the manuscript, publication of a correction or retraction, notification of the authors’ institutions or funding agencies, and restrictions on future submissions. Prior to final action, the Editor-in-Chief may consult with the publisher and relevant advisory or legal bodies. All affected parties will be formally informed of the outcome.